Volume 2020 : 3
The Internet of Things (IoT) at the intersection of data protection and trade secrets. Non-conventional paths to counter data appropriation and empower consumers
Data ownership and data access in the Internet of Things (IoT)
Contractual liability for defective Internet of Things (IoT) products – What can the UK learn from the EU approach?
The Internet of Things (IoT) and the meaning of “personal data”: a case study in regulation for rights
Limits of fairness and transparency in Internet of Things (IoT) contracts concluded with consumers
Regulating security for the consumer Internet of Things (IoT)
The disappearing computer: consent and disclosure in the world of smart objects
Can “things” be Defective Products? The applicability of the Product Liability Directive to the Internet of Things (IoT)
Do Smart Things Make Us Dumb? Reflections on the Addiction Crisis of Cyborg Consumerism
The Internet of Things (IoT) at the intersection of data protection and trade secrets. Non-conventional paths to counter data appropriation and empower consumers
Data ownership and data access in the Internet of Things (IoT)
Contractual liability for defective Internet of Things (IoT) products – What can the UK learn from the EU approach?
The Internet of Things (IoT) and the meaning of “personal data”: a case study in regulation for rights
Limits of fairness and transparency in Internet of Things (IoT) contracts concluded with consumers
Regulating security for the consumer Internet of Things (IoT)
The disappearing computer: consent and disclosure in the world of smart objects
Can “things” be Defective Products? The applicability of the Product Liability Directive to the Internet of Things (IoT)
Do Smart Things Make Us Dumb? Reflections on the Addiction Crisis of Cyborg Consumerism
Année
2020
Volume
2020
Numéro
3
Page
503
Langue
Anglais
Juridiction
Référence
M. RICHARDSON e.a., “The Internet of Things (IoT) and the meaning of “personal data”: a case study in regulation for rights”, REDC 2020, nr. 3, 503-522
Résumé
This Article considers the different meanings of “personal data”/“personal information” in modern data protection regimes. It notes that legislative meaning as framed, construed and applied is not necessarily treated as corresponding directly to common lexical meaning. Indeed, it often reflects a policy choice about what should be regulated and conversely what should be treated as beyond regulation. The meaning ascribed to “personal data”/“personal information” as set out in a data protection regime and deployed in policy decisions by commissioners and courts offers an example of meaning more or less shaped by considerations of rights. Specifically, the Article considers the meaning of “personal data” with respect to data processing by the Internet of Things (IoT), suggesting that the treatment of such data as “personal data” provides a useful case study on policy decisions to seek to regulate, or not, the processing of data under a modern data protection regime. As to relevant policies, the Article argues that a broad flexible definition of “personal data” fits well with a human rights approach (and need not be inconsistent with an economic approach to rights) but this does not preclude, and ideally should be combined with, a rigorous economic approach to the question of how regulation can be designed to efficiently foster innovation and minimise harm in the most cost-effective way.
Cher visiteur,
Cette page est resevée aux menbres de Jurisquare.
Veuillez vous connecter en cliquant sur le bouton 'Log in' ci-dessous, ou demander sans engagement une offre personnalisée en cliquant sur le bouton 'Abonner'. A partir de € 422,57(hors TVA) par an vous devenez déjà membre de Jurisquare et pouvez déjà accéder à la plus grande bibliothèque juridique digitale de Belgique!