Volume 12 : 2
Editorial
Is the Statement of Reasons for Civil Judicial Decisions an Effective Guarantee?
Access Filters and the Institutional Performance of the Supreme Courts
The Domestic Legislative Implementation of the EAPO Regulation: Integration and Frictions With National Civil Procedural Systems
‘Undressing” the Procedure: Three Limits of Civil Procedure and the Role of Proportionality
Justice in Ukraine Under Martial Law
The Public Policy Defence in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Greece
The Greek Cadastral Law as a Cluster of Rules of Substantive and Procedural Law and Its Incorporation Into the European Framework
La Représentation Des Mineurs à L’action en Justice en Matière Civile: Faculté ou Obligation D’agir ?
Grandes Décisions / Leading Cases
Débat / Debate: No, Your Honour! Do Judicial Reasoning Styles Influence the Degree of Acceptance of Court Rulings by the General Public?
Book Review
Editorial
Is the Statement of Reasons for Civil Judicial Decisions an Effective Guarantee?
Access Filters and the Institutional Performance of the Supreme Courts
The Domestic Legislative Implementation of the EAPO Regulation: Integration and Frictions With National Civil Procedural Systems
‘Undressing” the Procedure: Three Limits of Civil Procedure and the Role of Proportionality
Justice in Ukraine Under Martial Law
The Public Policy Defence in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Greece
The Greek Cadastral Law as a Cluster of Rules of Substantive and Procedural Law and Its Incorporation Into the European Framework
La Représentation Des Mineurs à L’action en Justice en Matière Civile: Faculté ou Obligation D’agir ?
Grandes Décisions / Leading Cases
Débat / Debate: No, Your Honour! Do Judicial Reasoning Styles Influence the Degree of Acceptance of Court Rulings by the General Public?
Book Review
Year
2022
Volume
12
Number
2
Page
230
Language
English
Court
Reference
C.S. GORIS, “The Domestic Legislative Implementation of the EAPO Regulation: Integration and Frictions With National Civil Procedural Systems”, IJPL 2022, nr. 2, 230-251
Recapitulation
This article concisely explores and comparatively analyses the different national legislation approved regarding Regulation No 655/2014, establishing a European Account Preservation Order (“EAPO Regulation”). More concretely, it aims to identify the commonalities among those EAPO national legislative acts and those cases in which national legislation might have distorted the original sense of the EAPO Regulation’s text. The article is structured as follows. After a brief explanation of the EAPO procedure, it examines the national implementing legislation. It first explores the rationale behind the implementing legislation of the EAPO and then the content of such legislation. Subsequently, it provides and analyses three examples in which domestic legislators might have misinterpreted the text of the EAPO Regulation.
Dear visitor
This page is reserved for Jurisquare members.
If you already are a member, please click the 'Log in' button below. If you would like to become a member, please click the 'Subscribe' button below. You can have access to the largest legal library in Belgium from € 422,57(VAT excl.) onwards!